Product:

Openshift

(Redhat)
Repositories • https://github.com/openshift/origin-server
• https://github.com/opencontainers/runc
• https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins
• https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive
• https://github.com/php/php-src
#Vulnerabilities 140
Date Id Summary Products Score Patch Annotated
2022-09-01 CVE-2022-2403 A credentials leak was found in the OpenShift Container Platform. The private key for the external cluster certificate was stored incorrectly in the oauth-serving-cert ConfigMaps, and accessible to any authenticated OpenShift user or service-account. A malicious user could exploit this flaw by reading the oauth-serving-cert ConfigMap in the openshift-config-managed namespace, compromising any web traffic secured using that certificate. Openshift 6.5
2022-12-08 CVE-2022-3260 The response header has not enabled X-FRAME-OPTIONS, Which helps prevents against Clickjacking attack.. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Openshift 4.8
2022-12-08 CVE-2022-3262 A flaw was found in Openshift. A pod with a DNSPolicy of "ClusterFirst" may incorrectly resolve the hostname based on a service provided. This flaw allows an attacker to supply an incorrect name with the DNS search policy, affecting confidentiality and availability. Openshift 8.1
2022-12-09 CVE-2022-3259 Openshift 4.9 does not use HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) which may allow man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. Openshift 7.4
2023-01-17 CVE-2023-0296 The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw (CVE-2016-2183) was reported for the health checks port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy, hence this port might be considered as still vulnerable to the same type of vulnerability. The health checks on etcd grpc-proxy do not contain sensitive data (only... Openshift 5.3
2023-01-26 CVE-2023-0229 A flaw was found in github.com/openshift/apiserver-library-go, used in OpenShift 4.12 and 4.11, that contains an issue that can allow low-privileged users to set the seccomp profile for pods they control to "unconfined." By default, the seccomp profile used in the restricted-v2 Security Context Constraint (SCC) is "runtime/default," allowing users to disable seccomp for pods they can create and modify. Openshift 6.3
2024-02-14 CVE-2024-1485 A flaw was found in the decompression function of registry-support. This issue can be triggered if an unauthenticated remote attacker tricks a user into parsing a devfile which uses the `parent` or `plugin` keywords. This could download a malicious archive and cause the cleanup process to overwrite or delete files outside of the archive, which should not be allowed. Registry\-Support, Openshift, Openshift_developer_tools_and_services 9.3
2016-05-17 CVE-2016-3721 Jenkins before 2.3 and LTS before 1.651.2 might allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary build parameters into the build environment via environment variables. Jenkins, Openshift 6.5
2017-11-09 CVE-2015-7501 Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache... Data_grid, Jboss_a\-Mq, Jboss_bpm_suite, Jboss_data_virtualization, Jboss_enterprise_application_platform, Jboss_enterprise_brms_platform, Jboss_enterprise_soa_platform, Jboss_enterprise_web_server, Jboss_fuse, Jboss_fuse_service_works, Jboss_operations_network, Jboss_portal, Openshift, Subscription_asset_manager, Xpaas 9.8
2019-02-11 CVE-2019-5736 runc through 1.0-rc6, as used in Docker before 18.09.2 and other products, allows attackers to overwrite the host runc binary (and consequently obtain host root access) by leveraging the ability to execute a command as root within one of these types of containers: (1) a new container with an attacker-controlled image, or (2) an existing container, to which the attacker previously had write access, that can be attached with docker exec. This occurs because of file-descriptor mishandling,... Mesos, Ubuntu_linux, Dc\/os, Kubernetes_engine, Docker, Fedora, Kubernetes_engine, Onesphere, Lxc, Runc, Service_management_automation, Hci_management_node, Solidfire, Backports_sle, Leap, Container_development_kit, Enterprise_linux, Enterprise_linux_server, Openshift 8.6