Note:
This project will be discontinued after December 13, 2021. [more]
Main entries ~3682 :
Remaining NVD entries (unprocessed / no code available): ~297333 :
Date | Id | Summary | Products | Score | Patch | Annotated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014-03-01 | CVE-2014-1912 | Buffer overflow in the socket.recvfrom_into function in Modules/socketmodule.c in Python 2.5 before 2.7.7, 3.x before 3.3.4, and 3.4.x before 3.4rc1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted string. | Mac_os_x, Python | N/A | ||
2014-04-07 | CVE-2014-0160 | Heartbleed - The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. | Symantec_messaging_gateway, Ubuntu_linux, Debian_linux, Fedora, Filezilla_server, V100_firmware, V60_firmware, Micollab, Mivoice, Openssl, Opensuse, Enterprise_linux_desktop, Enterprise_linux_server, Enterprise_linux_server_aus, Enterprise_linux_server_eus, Enterprise_linux_server_tus, Enterprise_linux_workstation, Gluster_storage, Storage, Virtualization, S9922l_firmware, Application_processing_engine_firmware, Cp_1543\-1_firmware, Elan\-8\.2, Simatic_s7\-1500_firmware, Simatic_s7\-1500t_firmware, Wincc_open_architecture, Splunk | 7.5 | ||
2021-09-08 | CVE-2021-40346 | An integer overflow exists in HAProxy 2.0 through 2.5 in htx_add_header that can be exploited to perform an HTTP request smuggling attack, allowing an attacker to bypass all configured http-request HAProxy ACLs and possibly other ACLs. | Haproxy, Haproxy_docker_image | 7.5 | ||
2016-06-08 | CVE-2016-5108 | Buffer overflow in the DecodeAdpcmImaQT function in modules/codec/adpcm.c in VideoLAN VLC media player before 2.2.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted QuickTime IMA file. | Debian_linux, Vlc_media_player | 9.8 | ||
2017-06-01 | CVE-2017-8386 | git-shell did not correctly validate the given project path, allowing an argument injection which leads to arbitrary file reads and in some configurations command execution. | Ubuntu_linux, Debian_linux, Fedora, Git\-Shell, Leap | 8.8 | ||
2018-04-06 | CVE-2018-1000156 | GNU patch is processd by ed. This allows arbitrary command executions through a line beginning with ! | Ubuntu_linux, Debian_linux, Patch, Enterprise_linux_desktop, Enterprise_linux_server, Enterprise_linux_server_aus, Enterprise_linux_server_eus, Enterprise_linux_server_tus, Enterprise_linux_workstation | 7.8 | ||
2018-06-08 | CVE-2018-4222 | There is an out-of-bounds read when compiling WebAssembly source buffers in WebKit. If the buffer is a view, the offset is added to the buffer twice before this is copied. This could allow memory off the heap to be read out of the source buffer, either though parsing exceptions or data sections when they are copied | Icloud, Iphone_os, Itunes, Safari, Tvos, Watchos, Ubuntu_linux | 8.8 |
Date | Id | Summary | Products | Score | Patch |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020-01-06 | CVE-2020-5840 | An issue was discovered in HashBrown CMS before 1.3.2. Server/Entity/Resource/Connection.js allows an attacker to reach a parent directory via a crafted name or ID field. | Hashbrown_cms | 7.5 | |
2020-01-06 | CVE-2019-18792 | An issue was discovered in Suricata 5.0.0. It is possible to bypass/evade any tcp based signature by overlapping a TCP segment with a fake FIN packet. The fake FIN packet is injected just before the PUSH ACK packet we want to bypass. The PUSH ACK packet (containing the data) will be ignored by Suricata because it overlaps the FIN packet (the sequence and ack number are identical in the two packets). The client will ignore the fake FIN packet because the ACK flag is not set. Both linux and... | Debian_linux, Suricata | 9.1 | |
2020-01-06 | CVE-2019-17568 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none | N/A | N/A | |
2020-01-06 | CVE-2019-19861 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none | N/A | N/A | |
2020-01-06 | CVE-2019-19862 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none | N/A | N/A | |
2020-01-06 | CVE-2019-19863 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none | N/A | N/A | |
2020-01-06 | CVE-2019-19864 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2019. Notes: none | N/A | N/A |