|
2021-05-27
|
CVE-2021-22118
|
In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.15 and versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.7, a WebFlux application is vulnerable to a privilege escalation: by (re)creating the temporary storage directory, a locally authenticated malicious user can read or modify files that have been uploaded to the WebFlux application, or overwrite arbitrary files with multipart request data.
|
Hci, Management_services_for_element_software, Commerce_guided_search, Communications_brm_\-_elastic_charging_engine, Communications_cloud_native_core_binding_support_function, Communications_cloud_native_core_policy, Communications_cloud_native_core_security_edge_protection_proxy, Communications_cloud_native_core_service_communication_proxy, Communications_cloud_native_core_unified_data_repository, Communications_diameter_intelligence_hub, Communications_element_manager, Communications_interactive_session_recorder, Communications_network_integrity, Communications_session_report_manager, Communications_session_route_manager, Communications_unified_inventory_management, Documaker, Enterprise_data_quality, Financial_services_analytical_applications_infrastructure, Healthcare_data_repository, Insurance_policy_administration, Insurance_rules_palette, Mysql_enterprise_monitor, Retail_assortment_planning, Retail_customer_management_and_segmentation_foundation, Retail_financial_integration, Retail_integration_bus, Retail_merchandising_system, Retail_order_broker, Retail_predictive_application_server, Utilities_testing_accelerator, Spring_framework
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
2022-04-14
|
CVE-2022-22968
|
In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.18, 5.2.0 - 5.2.20, and older unsupported versions, the patterns for disallowedFields on a DataBinder are case sensitive which means a field is not effectively protected unless it is listed with both upper and lower case for the first character of the field, including upper and lower case for the first character of all nested fields within the property path.
|
Active_iq_unified_manager, Cloud_secure_agent, Metrocluster_tiebreaker, Snap_creator_framework, Snapmanager, Mysql_enterprise_monitor, Spring_framework
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
2022-05-12
|
CVE-2022-22970
|
In spring framework versions prior to 5.3.20+ , 5.2.22+ and old unsupported versions, applications that handle file uploads are vulnerable to DoS attack if they rely on data binding to set a MultipartFile or javax.servlet.Part to a field in a model object.
|
Active_iq_unified_manager, Brocade_san_navigator, Cloud_secure_agent, Oncommand_insight, Financial_services_crime_and_compliance_management_studio, Spring_framework
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
2022-05-12
|
CVE-2022-22971
|
In spring framework versions prior to 5.3.20+ , 5.2.22+ and old unsupported versions, application with a STOMP over WebSocket endpoint is vulnerable to a denial of service attack by an authenticated user.
|
Cloud_secure_agent, Oncommand_insight, Financial_services_crime_and_compliance_management_studio, Spring_framework
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
2020-01-17
|
CVE-2020-5398
|
In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input.
|
Data_availability_services, Snapcenter, Application_testing_suite, Communications_billing_and_revenue_management_elastic_charging_engine, Communications_cloud_native_core_policy, Communications_diameter_signaling_router, Communications_element_manager, Communications_policy_management, Communications_session_report_manager, Communications_session_route_manager, Enterprise_manager_base_platform, Financial_services_regulatory_reporting_with_agilereporter, Flexcube_private_banking, Healthcare_master_person_index, Insurance_calculation_engine, Insurance_policy_administration_j2ee, Insurance_rules_palette, Mysql, Rapid_planning, Retail_assortment_planning, Retail_back_office, Retail_bulk_data_integration, Retail_central_office, Retail_financial_integration, Retail_integration_bus, Retail_order_broker, Retail_point\-Of\-Service, Retail_predictive_application_server, Retail_returns_management, Retail_service_backbone, Siebel_engineering_\-_installer_\&_deployment, Weblogic_server, Spring_framework
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
2020-01-17
|
CVE-2020-5397
|
Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome...
|
Application_testing_suite, Communications_brm_\-_elastic_charging_engine, Communications_diameter_signaling_router, Communications_element_manager, Communications_policy_management, Communications_session_route_manager, Enterprise_manager_base_platform, Financial_services_regulatory_reporting_with_agilereporter, Flexcube_private_banking, Healthcare_master_person_index, Insurance_calculation_engine, Insurance_policy_administration_j2ee, Insurance_rules_palette, Mysql_enterprise_monitor, Rapid_planning, Retail_assortment_planning, Retail_back_office, Retail_central_office, Retail_financial_integration, Retail_integration_bus, Retail_order_broker, Retail_point\-Of\-Service, Retail_predictive_application_server, Retail_returns_management, Retail_service_backbone, Weblogic_server, Spring_framework
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
2022-04-01
|
CVE-2022-22965
|
A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.
|
Cx_cloud_agent, Communications_cloud_native_core_automated_test_suite, Communications_cloud_native_core_console, Communications_cloud_native_core_network_exposure_function, Communications_cloud_native_core_network_function_cloud_native_environment, Communications_cloud_native_core_network_repository_function, Communications_cloud_native_core_network_slice_selection_function, Communications_cloud_native_core_policy, Communications_cloud_native_core_security_edge_protection_proxy, Communications_cloud_native_core_unified_data_repository, Communications_policy_management, Financial_services_analytical_applications_infrastructure, Financial_services_behavior_detection_platform, Financial_services_enterprise_case_management, Mysql_enterprise_monitor, Product_lifecycle_analytics, Retail_xstore_point_of_service, Sd\-Wan_edge, Operation_scheduler, Sipass_integrated, Siveillance_identity, Access_appliance, Flex_appliance, Netbackup_appliance, Netbackup_flex_scale_appliance, Netbackup_virtual_appliance, Spring_framework
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
2011-10-04
|
CVE-2011-2894
|
Spring Framework 3.0.0 through 3.0.5, Spring Security 3.0.0 through 3.0.5 and 2.0.0 through 2.0.6, and possibly other versions deserialize objects from untrusted sources, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended security restrictions and execute untrusted code by (1) serializing a java.lang.Proxy instance and using InvocationHandler, or (2) accessing internal AOP interfaces, as demonstrated using deserialization of a DefaultListableBeanFactory instance to execute arbitrary commands...
|
Spring_framework, Spring_security
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2018-04-06
|
CVE-2018-1270
|
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack.
|
Debian_linux, Application_testing_suite, Big_data_discovery, Communications_converged_application_server, Communications_diameter_signaling_router, Communications_performance_intelligence_center, Communications_services_gatekeeper, Enterprise_manager_ops_center, Goldengate_for_big_data, Health_sciences_information_manager, Healthcare_master_person_index, Insurance_calculation_engine, Insurance_rules_palette, Primavera_gateway, Retail_back_office, Retail_central_office, Retail_customer_insights, Retail_integration_bus, Retail_open_commerce_platform, Retail_order_broker, Retail_point\-Of\-Sale, Retail_predictive_application_server, Retail_returns_management, Retail_xstore_point_of_service, Service_architecture_leveraging_tuxedo, Tape_library_acsls, Fuse, Spring_framework
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
2018-03-16
|
CVE-2018-1199
|
Spring Security (Spring Security 4.1.x before 4.1.5, 4.2.x before 4.2.4, and 5.0.x before 5.0.1; and Spring Framework 4.3.x before 4.3.14 and 5.0.x before 5.0.3) does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with special encodings, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers...
|
Rapid_planning, Retail_xstore_point_of_service, Fuse, Spring_framework, Spring_security
|
5.3
|
|
|