Note:
This project will be discontinued after December 13, 2021. [more]
Product:
Libgcrypt
(Gnupg)Repositories |
Unknown: This might be proprietary software. |
#Vulnerabilities | 15 |
Date | Id | Summary | Products | Score | Patch | Annotated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021-09-06 | CVE-2021-40528 | The ElGamal implementation in Libgcrypt before 1.9.4 allows plaintext recovery because, during interaction between two cryptographic libraries, a certain dangerous combination of the prime defined by the receiver's public key, the generator defined by the receiver's public key, and the sender's ephemeral exponents can lead to a cross-configuration attack against OpenPGP. | Libgcrypt | 5.9 | ||
2021-01-29 | CVE-2021-3345 | _gcry_md_block_write in cipher/hash-common.c in Libgcrypt version 1.9.0 has a heap-based buffer overflow when the digest final function sets a large count value. It is recommended to upgrade to 1.9.1 or later. | Libgcrypt, Communications_billing_and_revenue_management | 7.8 | ||
2021-06-08 | CVE-2021-33560 | Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP. | Debian_linux, Fedora, Libgcrypt, Communications_cloud_native_core_binding_support_function, Communications_cloud_native_core_network_function_cloud_native_environment, Communications_cloud_native_core_network_repository_function, Communications_cloud_native_core_network_slice_selection_function, Communications_cloud_native_core_service_communication_proxy | 7.5 | ||
2019-06-20 | CVE-2019-12904 | In Libgcrypt 1.8.4, the C implementation of AES is vulnerable to a flush-and-reload side-channel attack because physical addresses are available to other processes. (The C implementation is used on platforms where an assembly-language implementation is unavailable.) NOTE: the vendor's position is that the issue report cannot be validated because there is no description of an attack | Libgcrypt, Leap | 5.9 | ||
2016-04-19 | CVE-2015-7511 | Libgcrypt before 1.6.5 does not properly perform elliptic-point curve multiplication during decryption, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to extract ECDH keys by measuring electromagnetic emanations. | Ubuntu_linux, Debian_linux, Libgcrypt | 2.0 |