Note:
This project will be discontinued after December 13, 2021. [more]
Product:
Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api
(Bouncycastle)Repositories | https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java |
#Vulnerabilities | 19 |
Date | Id | Summary | Products | Score | Patch | Annotated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-06-04 | CVE-2016-1000343 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA key pair generator generates a weak private key if used with default values. If the JCA key pair generator is not explicitly initialised with DSA parameters, 1.55 and earlier generates a private value assuming a 1024 bit key size. In earlier releases this can be dealt with by explicitly passing parameters to the key pair generator. | Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api, Debian_linux | 7.5 | ||
2018-06-05 | CVE-2018-1000180 | Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later. | Fips_java_api, Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api, Debian_linux, Oncommand_workflow_automation, Api_gateway, Business_process_management_suite, Business_transaction_management, Communications_application_session_controller, Communications_converged_application_server, Communications_webrtc_session_controller, Enterprise_repository, Managed_file_transfer, Peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletools, Retail_convenience_and_fuel_pos_software, Retail_xstore_point_of_service, Soa_suite, Webcenter_portal, Weblogic_server, Jboss_enterprise_application_platform, Virtualization | 7.5 | ||
2019-10-08 | CVE-2019-17359 | The ASN.1 parser in Bouncy Castle Crypto (aka BC Java) 1.63 can trigger a large attempted memory allocation, and resultant OutOfMemoryError error, via crafted ASN.1 data. This is fixed in 1.64. | Tomee, Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api, Active_iq_unified_manager, Oncommand_api_services, Oncommand_workflow_automation, Service_level_manager, Business_process_management_suite, Communications_convergence, Communications_diameter_signaling_router, Communications_session_route_manager, Data_integrator, Financial_services_analytical_applications_infrastructure, Flexcube_private_banking, Hospitality_guest_access, Managed_file_transfer, Peoplesoft_enterprise_hcm_global_payroll_switzerland, Peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletools, Retail_xstore_point_of_service, Soa_suite, Webcenter_portal, Weblogic_server | 7.5 | ||
2018-04-16 | CVE-2018-5382 | The default BKS keystore use an HMAC that is only 16 bits long, which can allow an attacker to compromise the integrity of a BKS keystore. Bouncy Castle release 1.47 changes the BKS format to a format which uses a 160 bit HMAC instead. This applies to any BKS keystore generated prior to BC 1.47. For situations where people need to create the files for legacy reasons a specific keystore type "BKS-V1" was introduced in 1.49. It should be noted that the use of "BKS-V1" is discouraged by the... | Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api, Satellite, Satellite_capsule | 4.4 | ||
2017-12-13 | CVE-2017-13098 | BouncyCastle TLS prior to version 1.0.3, when configured to use the JCE (Java Cryptography Extension) for cryptographic functions, provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key exchange is negotiated. An attacker can recover the private key from a vulnerable application. This vulnerability is referred to as "ROBOT." | Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api | 5.9 | ||
2018-06-04 | CVE-2016-1000352 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the ECIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider. | Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api | 7.4 | ||
2018-06-04 | CVE-2016-1000346 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the other party DH public key is not fully validated. This can cause issues as invalid keys can be used to reveal details about the other party's private key where static Diffie-Hellman is in use. As of release 1.56 the key parameters are checked on agreement calculation. | Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api, Debian_linux | 3.7 | ||
2018-06-04 | CVE-2016-1000345 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES/ECIES CBC mode vulnerable to padding oracle attack. For BC 1.55 and older, in an environment where timings can be easily observed, it is possible with enough observations to identify when the decryption is failing due to padding. | Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api, Debian_linux | 5.9 | ||
2018-06-04 | CVE-2016-1000344 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider. | Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api | 7.4 | ||
2018-06-04 | CVE-2016-1000342 | In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure. | Legion\-Of\-The\-Bouncy\-Castle\-Java\-Crytography\-Api, Debian_linux | 7.5 |